tvman44 Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 I have a 1/4 sheet palm sander and wondering about a 5" random orbital sander. Is there any advantage to a ROS over a 1/4 sheet palm sander? Would a ROS be any more agressive than a 1/4 sheet palm sander using the same grit sand paper? A 1/4 sheet palm sander has the advantage of being able to use a 1/4 sheey of sand paper or a roll of 4 1/2" of paper cut to 5 1/2" long, where a ROS needs the 5" round disc with hook/loop fasteners. Just wondering if I would gain anything getting a ROS since I already have 2 of the 1/4 sheet palm sanders. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 http://www.woodworking-news.com/woodworking-tips/random-vs-sheet-sanders.shtml Here's some good info to help with your question. tomsteve 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amazingkevin Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 I find that every sanders different. two of the same type sanders are different ones aggressive the other not so.Random orbital sanders tend to be self cleaning more and i suppose would be more aggressive than vibrating sheet sanders .But still all sanders are different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amazingkevin Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 Nice find Dan! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvman44 Posted March 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 Good article Dan, thanks. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LarryEA Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 My comments are: My orbit sander uses velcro like discs to attach. Your sand paper is cheaper. Variable speed is an advantage (mine has only one speed). Orbit sander does not sand with the grain or against it either, may need xtra sanding I'm timid about sanding fretwork with an orbit, but I do. ROS does great job collecting sanding dust in the bag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldhudson Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 I have both types. I use the 5" random orbit sander a lot more than the palm sander, but not for scroll work. The random orbit sander uses the velcro sanding sheets (really fast and easy to change grits) and is variable speed. It just covers a lot more territory than the palm sander can. I find the palm sander a bit safer when working on delicate projects. The dust collection holes on a random orbit sander can grab stock and mess you up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgman Posted March 1, 2015 Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 I have a very nice Makita 1/4 sheet sander and two Porter Cable 333 random orbital sanders. That very nice 1/4 sheet sander stays in its case on a shelf. It never gets used. I use one 333 RO constantly. The other is a spare. Anyone want to buy a rarely used 1/4 sheet sander? Well actually, I'll keep it for that rare time that I might need it. Jim Finn and Rob Roy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsN Posted March 2, 2015 Report Share Posted March 2, 2015 I have a skill octo sander. It is a ros with some detail accessory attachments. I love it and use it all the time. I have a 1/4 sheet that sits in a box on the shelf. I think there might be another sander on the shelf, but can't remember what it is. Jim Finn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ike Posted March 2, 2015 Report Share Posted March 2, 2015 I have both types ;of sanders and I prefer the Mouse over all others for this purpose, the sand paper is a little more expensive but I still prefer it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.