Paladin Posted June 19, 2019 Report Share Posted June 19, 2019 Any familiar with both of these to make a comparison between them? I've used the FD-PS for many years, but was wondering how the Pegas DST perform. They seem to be similar in tooth configuration. I really like the FD-PSR for staying cool and not burning the wood. Most times I am running my saw at full speed and the blade can heat up quickly. Just wondering if Pegas version will work the same? OCtoolguy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrappile Posted June 19, 2019 Report Share Posted June 19, 2019 (edited) Just my opinion, FD-PS and FR-PSR have been my go to blades for soft and thinner woods for a long time. Usually in #2 size. I have the tried the Pegas and they work fine but I find I use a size larger #3 where I would normally use a #2 FD. I also find they are a little more aggressive than the FD. Can't say I really like one over the other. They are the same but a little different....... I don't really think it would be worth changing if you are happy with the FD blades.... But you may find differently. Edited June 19, 2019 by Scrappile kmmcrafts, JTTHECLOCKMAN and OCtoolguy 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmmcrafts Posted June 19, 2019 Report Share Posted June 19, 2019 Never liked the skip tooth blades myself.. I will say that the Pegas blades do seem like they run a tad smaller in size than FD blades from what I've seen.. But I only used the FD Ultra Reverse and the Pegas MG so cannot really comment on the types you mentioned.. Wouldn't hurt to order a sample and see if they are something you like.. OCtoolguy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.