Jump to content

Positive vs. Negative (not opinions)


FrankEV

Recommended Posts

First let me provide "my" definetion or these terms.  In scroll saw fret work we cut away areas in a wood panel to expose a recognizable image to the human eye/brain. 

In some patterns we cut away the wood around the image - with or without an inclusive cut frame - where the cut panel is a "positive" image  (my definition) and the background is just that, a background.  The image is a projection above the backer.  

In other patterns the wood that is cut away creates the image, where the cut panel is a "negative':, again my definition, with the backer providing a contrasting color that  produces what the human sees as an image. In this type of cutting the image is only perceived and alwasy has a lot of gaps that are filled in by the brain to form the image.

BTW, there is also another version where both positive and negative is done on the same piece...I've don a few like that.

I'm hope my definitions are making sense and y'all understand the difference I'm describing.

There are no real Q&A here.  Maybe just a little discussion, comments, opinions, likes, dislikes about these different methods of  image creation.  Or maybe a better discusion is, which kind of "positive" of "negative" image creation is found to be more appealing to those who view, and/or comment on our. work? 

I'm not really considering Plaques or multiple layer pieces for this discussion altough there may be some revelance there also.

In this virtual meeting of the membership the floor is hereby open for discussion.    

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started out doing regular sillouettes where you cut out the pieces and toss them and save the main piece. 

had to worry abotu those eye pieces and such that would fall out if not connected and the like. 

I was doing one and sort of winging it one day and after I cut out the pieces i had difficulty seeing exactly what i was doing so i put the cut out pieces back in to see if I could figure it out. 

Was sold right then and there that by just having contrasting color pieces it will make the artwork much better, for me anyway. 

I have thought about going back to some sillouettes but doing them the other way,  Getting rid of the main pattern and only saving the cut out pieces but havent got around to it yet.  Sort of a photo negative type thing. 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank your mermaid did have both posituve and negatiive silouettes. It make the viewer think.  For me it was easy to see the mermaid. Only after we discussed how to paint it did I realize it was both pos and neg.

So i guess the decision would be how or what the whole picture /story wants to be.   

If you want the viewer to think about the scene it is a good way to get them to pause and feel the art piece. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oldhudson said:

I can't help but think a picture of examples, demonstrating your definitions, would be of value here.

You are correct, see below.

 

5 hours ago, Wichman said:

If I understand correctly, in the following image (from Steve Goods site) the football is a "positive" image; the lettering, lacing, bands, and figures are "negative" images.

15789879802020ncaafootball.jpg.d0bcb04ebe107c87d8942bb2efd51de2.jpg

wichman's example is not quite what I was refering to, but as a plaque it is a "Negative" Image within a "Positive" image that is acting as the background..

 

I should have include the following examples of what I was refering to in my original post.

My recent Bragging Rights post "Alucard...: is a good example of what I call a  "Negative" Image.  The wood removed from the cut panel revealed the Image and the cut panel itself creates the background . It is important to note that the images has many gaps/bridges in the image perimeter and the image is made up of many small cut out areas.  

1904878693_CatleviniaAlucard2.thumb.jpg.b6bec1e95171215a2f5310496595f0ea.jpg

 

An earliier post, my "Chinese Dragon" is a good example of a what I call a "Positive" Image.  The Removal of the surounding wood reveals the image and the backer becomes the background.  In this cutting the entire perimeter of the image is continuous and even if not mounted on a backer the image would be recognizable.

1705957970_ChineseDragon-SueMay.thumb.jpg.5a3d378e2aec40032980644ed4c9f3f5.jpg

 

Going way back, my piece called "Pretty Kitty - Jaguar" is and example of what I see as are somewhat the combination of both. Although the image is actually a "Positive" image, because there are many gaps in the "Image" perimeter itself, it needs the eye to see the image as a continuous subject like a "Negative" image does.

151924379_PrettyKitty-Jaguar-Craftsmanspace.thumb.jpg.75f7fa5241754e085b12fd8d4e4b1e73.jpg

 

15 hours ago, octoolguy said:

Sorry but I have no idea what you are asking. 

Hope this clears up my original post, especially for octoolguy!!! 😇

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FrankEV said:

You are correct, see below.

 

wichman's example is not quite what I was refering to, but as a plaque it is a "Negative" Image within a "Positive" image that is acting as the background..

 

I should have include the following examples of what I was refering to in my original post.

My recent Bragging Rights post "Alucard...: is a good example of what I call a  "Negative" Image.  The wood removed from the cut panel revealed the Image and the cut panel itself creates the background . It is important to note that the images has many gaps/bridges in the image perimeter and the image is made up of many small cut out areas.  

1904878693_CatleviniaAlucard2.thumb.jpg.b6bec1e95171215a2f5310496595f0ea.jpg

 

An earliier post, my "Chinese Dragon" is a good example of a what I call a "Positive" Image.  The Removal of the surounding wood reveals the image and the backer becomes the background.  In this cutting the entire perimeter of the image is continuous and even if not mounted on a backer the image would be recognizable.

1705957970_ChineseDragon-SueMay.thumb.jpg.5a3d378e2aec40032980644ed4c9f3f5.jpg

 

Going way back, my piece called "Pretty Kitty - Jaguar" is and example of what I see as are somewhat the combination of both. Although the image is actually a "Positive" image, because there are many gaps in the "Image" perimeter itself, it needs the eye to see the image as a continuous subject like a "Negative" image does.

151924379_PrettyKitty-Jaguar-Craftsmanspace.thumb.jpg.75f7fa5241754e085b12fd8d4e4b1e73.jpg

 

Hope this clears up my original post, especially for octoolguy!!! 😇

Thanks Frank. I was just sort of "confused" over the question. Still not sure what difference it makes. But, that's just me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cut some of everything. positive, negative and mixed. It sort of depends on what the project is, what materials I have on hand and how I want to finish it.

If it is a project I am going to paint, it is typically cut positive. Also, most ornaments that I cut are positive because I think the show better on a tree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...