Jump to content
🎄 🎄 🎄 2024 Custom Ornament Business Kit - Now Available - SALE 50% Off Through Dec. 2nd ×
Ornaments For Charity eBook - Designers Wanted! ​​​​​​​🙏 ×

Polar Vs Ultra Reverse Blades


Recommended Posts

I wanted the opinions of other scrollers on the pros and cons of the Flying Dutchman Ultra Reverse.

 

I have been using the Flying Dutchman Polar and New Spiral blades for years and years. Depending on the project, I use Polar #3, #5, & #7 and New Spiral #1 & #3. I like how tough they are, how fast I can cut with them and how I can get good cutting time on each blade. The negative - in my mind - is the amount of rip out and fuzzies which need burning and sanding to get rid of.

 

Based on a recommendation, I bought some Flyng Dutchman Ultra Reverse #3 and #5. The good points of the Ultra Reverse is how clean it cuts - no rip out or fuzzies - and how tight I can cut on delicut sections. The negatives are that they cut slower and dull faster then the Polar. I think I will treat them like a specialty tool that I only use in specific situations.

 

As I see it the Polar is a tough blade that has good cutting time but creates rip outs and the Ultra Reverse is a blade that cuts very cleanly and has great control in tight designs but only lasts half the time of an equal size Polar. Is the need to sand extensively worth the cost of using twice as many blades?

 

I am not sure if I am expecting too much from these blades. I will state that I cut aggresively, I stack cut 4 or 5 pieces of 1/8th inch Baltic Birch because I generally cut 10 to 15 of each design in order to have pieces for the art shows I do.

 

Does anybody else have an opinion of the Ultra Reverse?

 

Thanks,

Mike

Edited by TXScrollsawartist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use scroll reverse exclusively as I don't want to sand any if at all.I always get a good hour out of the blades or more.if I break one it's because of being in a rush,or careless  .They are a fragile sort and need respect using them.i love them Have'nt used a polar since I started years and years ago. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using the FD-UR #1 and #3s. I know the dent in the end of the blade is the top (I think so). They are sharp and cut very good. But I don't see where people that use them say there are no fuzzies! Everything I cut with them have to be sanded. They leave just as much fuzz as any other blade I have used. They're good blades, I still buy and use them but they leave a lot of fuzz, on top and bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Ultra Reverse almost exclusively for most cutting.  I use Polar blades when doing some compound cutting.

 

On Baltic Birch I get a few fuzzies on the bottom piece that can be used with a little sanding. (usually quick pass on sanding mop)

 

What I really like is how smooth the interior is.  I have done 3/4 inch cherry with UR-5 and get no burning and it is as smooth as glass on inside.

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UR blades do leave a little bit of fuzzies on plywood but almost none on hardwood. As for the cost of the blades vs the sanding time, I will spend the extra $ or two on the blades because of how much better the finished produce looks. All blades have a purpose, but some people can get acceptable use for other projects. To me the blades are cheap. If I use 12 blades instead of 6 on a project the cost is about $1.50. That's cheaper than buying a soda or tea at a restaurant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting sold on them the more I use them. I cut two new stack cut pieces last night and the slight fuzzies that were produced were very easily sanded off.

 

Anybody was to buy 6 or 7 gross of various sized Polars?

 

Thanks for the comments and insight. This is what I was hoping to get from this group.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don,

 

Two points. If you would have used an FD-Polar #3 or #5 you would have had tear outs - not just fuzzies -  on the bottom side of a piece of 3/4 poplar. I think if you used an UR #5 you might not have as many fuzzies.

 

Does anybody else know about increasing the size to a UR #5 for cutting hardwood?

 

Mke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently cut some stand up puzzles from 3/4 " Oak, Birch and Walnut Using FD-UR#7 Blades.  No fuzzies to speak of except on the Walnut which had a little bit.  I also cut 1/2" Mahogany using a FD-UR#5 and it did have a few fuzzies but not as much as your Poplar is showing.  I think the softer woods end up with more fuzzies that the harder ones.

 

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Flying Dutchman Polar #5 blades... but then I do not do any fretwork and rarely cut plywood. I mostly do inlay work. I have some Flying Dutchman heavy duty blades that I finally found a good use for:  Stack cutting through seven layers of Masonite paneling making lettered signs.  Polar # 5's also work but the heavy duty blades seem to last longer.  No fuzzies with either blade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is said that there is  no perfect blade.  What might work best for me may not work so well for you, That is what I have seen so many times. So my advice would be , try as many as you like, you will need to probably take notes on which blades you like best on different thinknesses and types of blades and decide for yourself, which you like working with best. some love spiral blades while others find them to not make the qulity of cuts they wish to have and visa versa. so it is an individual thing, I believe. I would never ignore others suggestions but i would still try them and see for myself.

 

Good luck on finding the 'perfect blades' for you

 

Dick

heppnerguy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...